www.HumanStriving.org

www.HumanStriving.org

Sports, Culture, & the Arts:


All Hail Queens Serena and Venus: Celebrating the Williams Sisters' Legacies


By Rev. Leah C.K. Lewis
July 17, 2015

Serena Williams is adored. She is revered. She dominates in such an elegant sport and the world knows it. Tennis lovers, especially those of us who understand her impact and age-defying accomplishments, are happy to be alive during her tenure, which is now twenty years and running.

Scores of women across generations, particularly those of us of African descent, find Serena and her older sister, Venus, also a five-time Wimbledon champion, endearing and inspiring. Interestingly, the only times Venus has lost at the Wimbledon finals are the three in which she was beat by Serena. In their supreme wisdom, the athletic gods saw fit to give the world to two chocolate-colored sister-goddesses. Both, after all, are multiple Olympic champions.

In a recent post-match interview, Serena complemented her big sister Venus with splendid attribution. Essentially, Serena noted the benefit of having Venus to look up too, to have as a practice partner, best friend, and confidante. Indeed, Venus, two years older, paved the way for Serena and has upheld her little sister effervescently with tremendous pride and poise as Serena has exceeded Venus in her number of major championships won.

We, the public, have not witnessed any envy, jealousy, or spite from Venus in what would be trying for almost anyone. Likewise, we have not seen arrogance or gloating from Serena. These two biological sisters embody the definition of love: “Love is patient, love is kind; it is not envious, boastful, arrogant, or rude; love does not insist on its own way; and it is not irritable or resentful.”

How blessed they are to have the benefit of one another’s company as they transverse the globe, overcome health challenges, pursue non-sport related interests, and win and lose matches. Together and with a host of family, friends, coaches, and supporters, Venus and Serena continue to surmount challenges associated with succeeding in a sport that has not always been welcoming of them—and which still poses hostilities from time to time—as they establish themselves as the most dominant pair of siblings, by far, in the history of tennis.

Queen Serena has her detractors and haters, but clearly, she drinks their tears as a delicate, and sustaining elixir of haterade. Over the years, I have marveled that neither she nor her sister Venus have ever once slipped and cursed anyone out. Remarkable resolve considering all these two dynamic champions have endured. The Williams are certainly better women than me—and most, if folks are honest. Their decorum shall be an enduring quality in the years to come and has been a standard against the ignorance and vitriol the Williams family has experienced both within and outside of tennis.

Serena is approaching the highest mark of modern-era Grand Slams at an age when most women and men have their best athletic days behind them. This past Saturday, at 33, Ms. Williams won her sixth Wimbledon title. The only other woman to win a Wimbledon title at the age of 33 or older is the great Martina Navratilova. Serena’s strength, fitness, and her stamina are apparent. Never has there been an athlete who has aged as gracefully as a fine cabernet or, better yet, a pinot noir.


With one more Grand Slam title, Serena will tie German Steffie Graf. With three more Grand Slam titles Serena will tie Margaret Court of Australia. So many of us hope we will witness history right along with Serena and Team Williams, should she surpass Ms. Court’s record. I imagine that Ora Washington, Althea Gibson, and Arthur Ashe are smiling while sitting courtside on the other side of the Jordan, cheering her on. In so doing, we know, as they know, that our Ancestors’ struggles in the class-conscious sport of tennis were not in vain.

For African Americans, the Williams Sisters hold particular significance. They are ours, and we are theirs—especially those of us with an appropriate sense of community and healthy self-esteem. We value them and hold at bay any negative depictions (and there have been far too many) of our ladies, who are model world citizens, consummate professionals, and well-rounded human beings.

Possibilities abound when young women and girls see themselves in Venus and Serena. Every little girl should be shown video of Venus and Serena when they were young. The tennis prodigies with their beads and braids, beautiful brown skin gleaming from the sweat of hard work and the beating of the sun, and the swoosh of their rackets on the cracked inner city courts of Compton. It is not hyperbole to assert that the talent held by these once little girls from Compton is emblematic of the potential and promise of every little African American girl.

Thankfully, there are currently a host of young women who are willing to follow in their exceptional footsteps. Taylor Townsend, Madison Keys, and Sloane Stephens are currently carrying Venus and Serena’s ceremonial trains. These young women are making names for themselves, and in the process, will pick up the mantle carried with such distinction by Venus and Serena.

The sisters have been paragons of virtue, dignity, and the idealized “American Dream.” Their mother and coach Oracene Price Williams is as composed as they come under the bright lights and scrutiny of celebrity. Richard Williams, father and coach of the amazing progeny Venus and Serena, is power and protection personified.

Driven by a visionary father, a deeply involved and supportive mother, these two hardworking, but supernaturally talented women, are luminary. Girls and young women have two stellar role models who have done the extraordinary in the rarified world of tennis.

The Williams family has shown the world what is possible even against the longest of odds. All hail, Queen Serena and Queen Venus.

Leah C.K. Lewis, J.D., M.Div., D.Min., (ABD), a frequent contributor to ForHarriet.com is sports enthusiast and former administrator in collegiate athletics. Follow her on Twitter @HumanStriving, Soundcloud, and Facebook. #StayWoke





Ciara Should Be the Only Person Talking About Her Sex Life



By Rev. Leah C.K. Lewis
July 20, 2015

Last week, Black people collectively went “D’awww…” when Seattle Seahawks Super Bowl winning quarterback Russell Wilson opened up about his romance with superstar singer Ciara, confessing that both had agreed to abstain from sex in their relationship. This week, Ciara’s “baby daddy” and ex-fiancĂ© Future indicated that Ciara did not make him wait. (Thank you, Captain Obvious.) However, what many people are missing is that it is rather unfortunate that two men spoke about their current or ex-girlfriend’s sex life. By doing so, they negated Ciara’s sexual agency, while also reinforcing age-old stereotypes about men and women’s virtue.


Consensual sex, in its proper context, is a thoroughly sacred encounter. From the Kama Sutra to Song of Solomon in the Old Testament, revered texts honor sex as a holy, beautiful, and healthy experience. Sex, then, like our romantic relationships, is best considered a private, precious matter. One that if disclosed should be done by mutual consent and with both parties present and accounted for.

Interestingly, Ciara was absent from each public revelation about her sex life. Casting a public gaze on Ciara’s sex life without her presence, permission, and participation is highly problematic.

Wilson, her current love interest, made the initial reveal during an interview conducted by former San Diego Charger and founding pastor of The Rock Church Miles McPherson. Pastor McPherson asked, “How’s your relationship going?” With that, Wilson freely, without prompting, offered that he and Ciara had agreed to abstain from sex. McPherson eyebrows seemed to rise (although McPherson and Wilson may very well have discussed this talking point prior to the interview). He then probed Wilson seeking clarification because Wilson was rather cryptic in his remarks. To which Wilson specified that he was talking about “sex.”
  
Did Wilson have Ciara’s permission to discuss their agreement? If not, her absence and his failure to gain mutual consent made void her sexual agency. In essence, she was objectified—Ciara become a voiceless absent entity, albeit one perceived as vaulted, pretty, and desirable.

In church parlance, Wilson positioned himself as a Christian “witness” offering a “testimony” as to God’s involvement in their relationship. In so many words, he asserted that God had spoken to him with an instruction that he, Russell, was to “lead her.” This came across as very patriarchal. Apparently, in Russell’s conception, God has appointed him to lead Ciara down the path of righteousness. I had the audacity to think that in the Christian faith, only the Holy Spirit and Jesus could do that. Could others play a role? Yes, but the substantive work of transformation is between the Divine and the individual. Russell went on to say that God had anointed both he and Ciara with talent, a call, and their huge platforms, in part, to show others the way to live a virtuous, Christian life as an unmarried couple.

Days later on HuffPost Live, Marc Lamont Hill, Ph.D., interviewed hip-hop artist Future. Inevitably, Hill, in his role as celebrity journalist (not as a scholar) turned their conversation to Ciara, Future ex-fiancĂ©, and mother of one of his children. Initially, Future’s comments regarding Ciara were respectful, exemplary, and affirming. He spoke with a measure of openness and vulnerability as a man who affirmed Ciara as the mother of his young child, his former lover, and best friend. Future noted at least twice that Ciara was discrete in her handling of the end of their engagement. What he revealed was that their relationship ended, not because of his alleged infidelity, but due to incompatible values and visions for their wedding and marriage.

Building up to seeming barbershop talk, Hill’s demeanor shifted to that of silly, giggling teenage boy as he posed a question from a viewer: “Did Ciara make you wait the way she is making Russell Wilson wait?” (Now, remember, according to Wilson, he was prompted by God to broach the subject of abstinence—not Ciara.) Future seemed completely taken aback, caught unawares, and even questioned Wilson motivation for making such a statement. Clearly, Future is not scrolling or trolling for Ciara. The man seems focused on his music, his babies, and his grind.

Even so, Future took Hill’s bait. Adamant that God did not tell him to wait, Future then revealed an intimate detail that the world could have done without. Apparently, Ciara had asked Future to pray with her after sex. Future actually evoked that her request made an indelible impression on him. He noted that no woman had ever asked him to pray after sexual intercourse and that it moved him into a deeper relationship with her.

Both Wilson’s unprompted reveal and Future’s surprising remarks muddy what could be otherwise healthy emotional and relational dynamics with Ciara by reinforcing age-old stereotypes. Sex, and even its alternative, abstinence, with a woman both men purported to respect were made tawdry, salacious, and a public spectacle; as opposed to sacred, pristine, and private. Ciara’s sexuality, without her apparent permission and participation was laid bare at the altar of men’s prying (Hill's), need for adoration (Wilson's), and virility (Future's).

These two public conversations about Ciara’s sexuality actually say more about the men involved than about her. Yes, she was objectified—in irony, the vocalist was made voiceless. But, the men were the actors in these two cases. The men were inappropriate, indiscrete, casually relaying intimate details best kept confidential. Ciara ought not bear the burdens of these demonstrations of machismo and immature maleness like we women tend to do. We must lay blame and responsibility properly. It is my hope that she promptly conversed with both men to rectify proper, firm boundaries around her sexuality. Women, individually and collectively, must do the same, and hold and articulate self-determined acceptable standards.

Wilson’s behavior is particularly troubling. As a man currently involved in what appears to be an otherwise adoring relationship with Ciara, who seeks to be the epitome of virtue, he seemingly fails to understand that “virtue” involves integrity, dignity, rectitude and honor. Instead of upholding Ciara’s virtue, he actually violated it. Rectitude, or morally correct behavior, under the pertinent circumstance required Wilson’s silence on the matter of Ciara’s sexuality. In the words of Flagstaff, the knight from Shakespeare’s Henry the Fourth, “The better part of valor is discretion.”

Leah C.K. Lewis, J.D., M.Div., D.Min. (ABD), a frequent contributor to ForHarriet.com recently completed her dissertation on sex and sexuality in the African American Baptist Church. Follow her @HumanStriving, SoundCloud.com/Reverend-Leah-CK-Lewis, and http:www.facebook.com/The.Reverend.Leah.CK.Lewis. Check out her personal blog at http://humanstriving.blogspot.com.




No comments:

Post a Comment